Security services.

How we help

We trace an agent workflow from instructions and retrieved content through tool calls, credentials, and external access. We review the current controls and implement changes to reduce identified exposure.

What you receive

• An access map covering tools, MCP servers, plugins, skills, credentials, and trusted inputs
• Verified findings with evidence and reproductions where applicable
• Implemented permission, sandbox, secrets, network, and approval controls
• Verification results and documentation for the people maintaining the workflow

Scope

We define the workflows, environments, permitted changes, verification coverage, and operational ownership before starting.

Agents and LLM applications consume content that may be controlled by someone outside your organization. Adversarial testing examines whether that content can redirect the application, cross a trust boundary, or trigger an unintended action.

What we test

We develop attacks around the agreed application and its available tools. Scenarios can include prompt injection through retrieved documents, tickets, or repository content; context poisoning; tool and MCP misuse; data exfiltration; and attempts to bypass approval steps.

Tests follow realistic entry points and permissions in an authorized environment. We examine the interaction between model behavior and application controls, including where an instruction becomes a tool call or sensitive data leaves a boundary. We record unsuccessful attempts as well as successful attack paths to make the coverage clear.

What you receive

• An adversarial test plan tied to the agreed threat scenarios
• Executed attack records and reproducible examples where applicable
• Prioritized findings with impact, prerequisites, and remediation guidance
• A walkthrough of observed behavior and testing limitations

Scope

We agree targets, permitted actions, test data, and stop conditions before testing. Results describe the tested deployment and scenarios; they do not guarantee resistance to every attack. Retesting is scoped separately or agreed upfront.

How we help

We turn AI governance requirements into working policies and processes. We connect approved uses, data handling, tool access, and review responsibilities to the systems your teams use.

What you receive

• An inventory of AI uses, tools, data flows, risks, and owners
• Usable policies for acceptable use, sensitive data, suppliers, and approvals
• Implemented review and exception workflows with clear responsibilities
• An evidence register and control checks against the agreed requirements

Scope

We define use cases, applicable requirements, implementation access, and ongoing review responsibilities. Readiness evidence supports review; it does not guarantee certification or an audit outcome.

Security flaws often span multiple components: a permission check in one service, a data transformation in another, and an assumption at the API boundary. A targeted review follows those paths through the implementation and design.

What we review

We focus on agreed components and security-sensitive flows, including authentication, authorization, session handling, input validation, secrets, and use of cryptography. Architecture review examines trust boundaries, service interactions, and where sensitive data is stored, transmitted, or exposed.

We trace relevant code paths and compare the implementation with intended behavior. Where practical, we validate suspected issues with focused examples or reproductions. Findings distinguish exploitable behavior, design weaknesses, and questions that require additional evidence.

What you receive

• Findings tied to specific code locations or design decisions
• Impact, prerequisites, and evidence for each confirmed issue
• Prioritized remediation guidance and proposed changes to controls
• A walkthrough to discuss findings with the engineers responsible for the reviewed components

Scope

We agree repositories, revisions, components, and available design material before starting. Coverage reflects those boundaries and the access provided. Fix implementation and follow-up verification are included only when agreed.

An application can enforce its intended behavior in ordinary use while allowing an attacker to bypass it through a different request, role, or sequence of actions. Penetration testing examines that gap in an authorized environment.

What we test

We test agreed web applications and API endpoints, focusing on authentication, authorization, session management, injection, sensitive data exposure, and business logic. We compare behavior across available roles and accounts, including attempts to access another user’s resources or perform actions outside an assigned role.

Testing combines manual investigation with tools where useful. We validate findings and record the requests, conditions, and application behavior needed to understand their impact. Test depth depends on available access, documentation, and the agreed attack scenarios.

What you receive

• A report describing tested targets, methods, and coverage limits
• Prioritized findings with evidence and reproduction steps
• Remediation guidance tied to the affected endpoints or workflows
• A walkthrough with engineering and security to clarify results

Scope

We agree endpoints, environments, credentials, permitted actions, and stop conditions before testing. Cloud infrastructure assessment requires its own explicit scope. Remediation verification or retesting is included only as agreed.

How we help

We design and implement security across application architecture, cloud infrastructure, and the development lifecycle. We connect threat models and findings to changes in code, configuration, pipelines, and team processes.

What you receive

• Threat models and a prioritized engineering plan
• Implemented identity, secrets, network, deployment, and application controls
• Security checks in development pipelines, with usable triage and remediation workflows
• Verification evidence, operating documentation, and ownership for the implemented controls

Scope

We define repositories, cloud environments, permitted changes, rollout and rollback procedures, and support responsibilities before implementation.

How we help

We establish and operate security monitoring around your systems and risks. We connect telemetry to useful detections, investigate alerts, and maintain workflows for escalation and response.

What you receive

• Integrated log sources and documented monitoring coverage
• Detection rules tested against representative scenarios
• Alert triage, investigation, and escalation workflows
• Operational reporting, tuning, and runbooks for maintaining the service

Scope

We define monitored systems, tooling, service hours, triage responsibilities, escalation contacts, and response authority. Coverage and availability are explicit parts of the engagement.

How we help

We prepare teams to investigate and contain security incidents. During a response engagement, we reconstruct events, assess affected systems and data, and carry out authorized containment and recovery actions.

What you receive

• Logging, evidence retention, response playbooks, and escalation procedures
• Incident timelines with supporting evidence and unresolved questions
• Containment and recovery actions coordinated with system owners
• A review of causes, control improvements, and follow-up work

Scope

We agree covered systems, availability, escalation paths, decision authority, and permitted actions. Response coverage begins under an explicit engagement; this service does not promise emergency or around-the-clock availability.

How we help

We make security reviews easier to answer and maintain. We connect customer questions and review requirements to your actual controls, identify gaps, and implement the changes needed to support accurate responses.

What you receive

• Completed security questionnaires with evidence-backed answers
• An organized evidence register and reusable response library
• Control remediation and updated policies or procedures
• A maintained review workflow with approval owners and open issues

Scope

We define the reviews, requirements, evidence access, remediation work, and approval responsibilities. Customer acceptance and audit outcomes remain decisions of the relevant reviewers.